about news events press store donate
This Web site is no longer active. Please use www.freepress.net instead of www2.freepress.net to access the current version of Free Press' Web site.
headlines advanced search must reads media minutes subscribe rss feeds
font size: [+] []

Email | Printer-Friendly

More on MPAA and Net Neutrality

From Los Angeles Times, March 17, 2008


MPAA chief Dan Glickman doesn’t speak for the movie industry, technically. His clients are the MPAA’s dues-paying members, the major Hollywood studios. And the interests of those studios — all owned by giant conglomerates — don’t necessarily align with their smaller brethren, just as the RIAA often parts ways on policy matters with the indie labels. A good illustration of this is a letter to Glickman released today by Jean Prewitt, president of the Independent Film and Television Alliance. She blasted Glickman for coming out against Net neutrality regulations earlier this week in a speech to theater owners. You can download the letter here, or just check out the money line:

The issue is not whether the government should regulate the Internet but whether there will be effective oversight to prevent a handful of corporate giants from imposing their own version of private regulation to the public’s detriment.

Not that the indies particularly mind the use of government regulatory power: last year IFTA called on the FCC to require networks to devote at least 25% of their programming lineups to shows from unaffiliated producers (Download here). Nevertheless, independent studios have a clear interest in Net neutrality rules that would prevent larger players from buying preferential treatment for their websites and online services, particularly with the opportunities dimming on cable, satellite and broadcast TV for smaller programmers. As Prewitt put it, “Allowing the Internet to become the exclusive province of a small number of large companies would inevitably harm the future of independent art and commerce.”

If Glickman releases a reply, I’ll update this post to include it.

This article is from Los Angeles Times. If you found it informative and valuable, we strongly encourage you to visit their Web site and register an account, if necessary, to view all their articles on the Web. Support quality journalism.

  • del.icio.us
  • digg
  • technorati
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Reddit
Email | Printer-Friendly
This article relates to:

Issues

Internet and Broadband

Campaigns

ICON Save the Internet
Join the Fight for Internet Freedom!
This article is copyrighted material, the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Home | Privacy & Copyright Policy | Contact Us | Tell a Friend | Work for us!
Freepress.net is a project of Free Press and the Free Press Action Fund
Massachusetts Office: 40 Main St, Suite 301, Florence, MA 01062 - Ph 877.888.1533 - Fax 413.585.8904
Washington, DC Office: 501 Third Street NW, Suite 875, Washington, DC 20001 - Ph 202.265.1490 - Fax 202.265.1489
Dedicated servers by SingleHop