<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Verdict at Stanford: We Want Net Neutrality</title>
	<link>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2008/04/18/verdict-at-stanford-we-want-net-neutrality/</link>
	<description>Tracking the battle over Network Neutrality</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 23:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: A Milestone in the Fight for Internet Rights at AlternativeMedia.eu &#38; ForbiddenNews.eu</title>
		<link>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2008/04/18/verdict-at-stanford-we-want-net-neutrality/#comment-122891</link>
		<dc:creator>A Milestone in the Fight for Internet Rights at AlternativeMedia.eu &#38; ForbiddenNews.eu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2008/04/18/verdict-at-stanford-we-want-net-neutrality/#comment-122891</guid>
		<description>[...] concludes the FCC’s months-long investigation, which included two public hearings at Harvard and Stanford universities — and more than 25,000 public [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] concludes the FCC’s months-long investigation, which included two public hearings at Harvard and Stanford universities — and more than 25,000 public [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bjatkinson</title>
		<link>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2008/04/18/verdict-at-stanford-we-want-net-neutrality/#comment-100939</link>
		<dc:creator>bjatkinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 20:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2008/04/18/verdict-at-stanford-we-want-net-neutrality/#comment-100939</guid>
		<description>net neutrality is the only thing that we have that most countries dont and we need this to help this country stay different from others</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>net neutrality is the only thing that we have that most countries dont and we need this to help this country stay different from others</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dehstil</title>
		<link>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2008/04/18/verdict-at-stanford-we-want-net-neutrality/#comment-99102</link>
		<dc:creator>dehstil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 00:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2008/04/18/verdict-at-stanford-we-want-net-neutrality/#comment-99102</guid>
		<description>Google has been pushing for a more open and easily accessible internet and various companies have been working on cloud computing and grandscale wifi.  I would like to push easier access to the internet backbone, leading to less control by large companies and hence a chance for those want certain freedoms to get it, by way of economic supply and demand instead of barking at the FCC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google has been pushing for a more open and easily accessible internet and various companies have been working on cloud computing and grandscale wifi.  I would like to push easier access to the internet backbone, leading to less control by large companies and hence a chance for those want certain freedoms to get it, by way of economic supply and demand instead of barking at the FCC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dehstil</title>
		<link>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2008/04/18/verdict-at-stanford-we-want-net-neutrality/#comment-99099</link>
		<dc:creator>dehstil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 00:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2008/04/18/verdict-at-stanford-we-want-net-neutrality/#comment-99099</guid>
		<description>Thank you Brett Glass.  I appreciated reading about the other side, especially http://www.brettglass.com/principles.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Brett Glass.  I appreciated reading about the other side, especially <a href="http://www.brettglass.com/principles.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.brettglass.com/principles.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daberle</title>
		<link>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2008/04/18/verdict-at-stanford-we-want-net-neutrality/#comment-99094</link>
		<dc:creator>daberle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 23:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2008/04/18/verdict-at-stanford-we-want-net-neutrality/#comment-99094</guid>
		<description>I absolutely support Net neutrality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I absolutely support Net neutrality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2008/04/18/verdict-at-stanford-we-want-net-neutrality/#comment-99026</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2008/04/18/verdict-at-stanford-we-want-net-neutrality/#comment-99026</guid>
		<description>[...] Save The Internet: We want net neutrality! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Save The Internet: We want net neutrality! [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett Glass</title>
		<link>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2008/04/18/verdict-at-stanford-we-want-net-neutrality/#comment-98988</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett Glass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 01:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2008/04/18/verdict-at-stanford-we-want-net-neutrality/#comment-98988</guid>
		<description>I was the only person on any of the panels who was an Internet service provider or had actual experience running one. For the full text of my prepared remarks, see http://www.brettglass.com/FCC/remarks.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was the only person on any of the panels who was an Internet service provider or had actual experience running one. For the full text of my prepared remarks, see <a href="http://www.brettglass.com/FCC/remarks.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.brettglass.com/FCC/remarks.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: barry payne-economist</title>
		<link>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2008/04/18/verdict-at-stanford-we-want-net-neutrality/#comment-98482</link>
		<dc:creator>barry payne-economist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 13:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2008/04/18/verdict-at-stanford-we-want-net-neutrality/#comment-98482</guid>
		<description>NET NEUTRALITY, THE LAST FRONTIER OF FREE SPEECH - ONE VOICE, ONE VOTE - FAIR AND BALANCED, IT PROVIDES, YOU DECIDE

When Verizon extends fiber to the curb and then cuts the copper cable behind it on the way out while Homeland Security gives lectures about the need for multiple paths of redundancy built into essential networks, it's time for net neutrality.

When large digital content companies align themselves with the digital pipes that distribute their content and coordinate public campaigns designed to concentrate content in a closed system, it's time for net neutrality.

When broadband service is available overseas for twice the speed at half the price while the public is lectured about how interference with private markets reduces economic efficiency, it's time for net neutrality.

When one cannot walk on a public street or in a shopping mall wearing a protest slogan on a tee shirt without being surveilled, tagged and run through a bank of data mines, it's time for net neutrality.

When public relations firms spend millions to generate messages disguised to appear as emerging independently from grassroot levels as well as professional sources, it's time for net neutrality.

When a broken health-care industry issues warnings that going online for medical information can be dangerous and one should see a physician before taking aspirin, it's time for net neutrality.

When a lobbying industry with over 30,000 members spends $17M a day while Congress is in session to influence the democratic process through special access, it's time for net neutrality.

When a broadband provider treats a public hearing like an annoying irritation from the public that just doesn't understand how markets work and buys up the seats like a strip mall crowding out the public square, it's time for net neutrality.

When broadband providers issue threats not to invest or build out networks under the competitive conditions imposed on content by network neutralty - in effect holding customers hostage to their market power over physical networks - it's time for net neutrality.

When the enforcement of property rights over content and security over the protection of the network is exploited and abused ad nauseum as absurd excuses to undermine the competition among content producers and consumers enabled by net neutrality, it's time for net neutrality.   

When "hands off the internet" means "hands on free speech", it's time for net neutrality.

It's the last frontier for spontaneous, self-organizing free speech to thrive from the bottom up on a level playing field, free of manipulation and crowding out from the top down.  One voice, one vote for anyone who wants to participate.

As Lawrence Lessig stated eloquently in the Standford hearing, support competition, support net neutrality - not its promise, its clear enforcement.  

It's not just an alternative to competition and free speech any more.  For many, it is the only alternative.  Let a thousand flowers bloom, and a thousand more ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NET NEUTRALITY, THE LAST FRONTIER OF FREE SPEECH - ONE VOICE, ONE VOTE - FAIR AND BALANCED, IT PROVIDES, YOU DECIDE</p>
<p>When Verizon extends fiber to the curb and then cuts the copper cable behind it on the way out while Homeland Security gives lectures about the need for multiple paths of redundancy built into essential networks, it&#8217;s time for net neutrality.</p>
<p>When large digital content companies align themselves with the digital pipes that distribute their content and coordinate public campaigns designed to concentrate content in a closed system, it&#8217;s time for net neutrality.</p>
<p>When broadband service is available overseas for twice the speed at half the price while the public is lectured about how interference with private markets reduces economic efficiency, it&#8217;s time for net neutrality.</p>
<p>When one cannot walk on a public street or in a shopping mall wearing a protest slogan on a tee shirt without being surveilled, tagged and run through a bank of data mines, it&#8217;s time for net neutrality.</p>
<p>When public relations firms spend millions to generate messages disguised to appear as emerging independently from grassroot levels as well as professional sources, it&#8217;s time for net neutrality.</p>
<p>When a broken health-care industry issues warnings that going online for medical information can be dangerous and one should see a physician before taking aspirin, it&#8217;s time for net neutrality.</p>
<p>When a lobbying industry with over 30,000 members spends $17M a day while Congress is in session to influence the democratic process through special access, it&#8217;s time for net neutrality.</p>
<p>When a broadband provider treats a public hearing like an annoying irritation from the public that just doesn&#8217;t understand how markets work and buys up the seats like a strip mall crowding out the public square, it&#8217;s time for net neutrality.</p>
<p>When broadband providers issue threats not to invest or build out networks under the competitive conditions imposed on content by network neutralty - in effect holding customers hostage to their market power over physical networks - it&#8217;s time for net neutrality.</p>
<p>When the enforcement of property rights over content and security over the protection of the network is exploited and abused ad nauseum as absurd excuses to undermine the competition among content producers and consumers enabled by net neutrality, it&#8217;s time for net neutrality.   </p>
<p>When &#8220;hands off the internet&#8221; means &#8220;hands on free speech&#8221;, it&#8217;s time for net neutrality.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the last frontier for spontaneous, self-organizing free speech to thrive from the bottom up on a level playing field, free of manipulation and crowding out from the top down.  One voice, one vote for anyone who wants to participate.</p>
<p>As Lawrence Lessig stated eloquently in the Standford hearing, support competition, support net neutrality - not its promise, its clear enforcement.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s not just an alternative to competition and free speech any more.  For many, it is the only alternative.  Let a thousand flowers bloom, and a thousand more &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FCC Hearing At Stanford About Net Neutrality &#171; Poet1960&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2008/04/18/verdict-at-stanford-we-want-net-neutrality/#comment-98320</link>
		<dc:creator>FCC Hearing At Stanford About Net Neutrality &#171; Poet1960&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 06:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2008/04/18/verdict-at-stanford-we-want-net-neutrality/#comment-98320</guid>
		<description>[...] 18, 2008 by poet1960    The FCC held another hearing at Stanford University today.  The previous one at Harvard last February, was almost ludicrous taking in to account the antics [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] 18, 2008 by poet1960    The FCC held another hearing at Stanford University today.  The previous one at Harvard last February, was almost ludicrous taking in to account the antics [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mediageek &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Stanford Score: Internet Freedom 1, Comcast United 0</title>
		<link>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2008/04/18/verdict-at-stanford-we-want-net-neutrality/#comment-98254</link>
		<dc:creator>mediageek &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Stanford Score: Internet Freedom 1, Comcast United 0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 22:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2008/04/18/verdict-at-stanford-we-want-net-neutrality/#comment-98254</guid>
		<description>[...] SavetheInternet.com has a short summary with links to some of the written testimony. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] SavetheInternet.com has a short summary with links to some of the written testimony. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
