<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Internet Bill a Blow to the Gatekeepers</title>
	<link>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2008/02/12/internet-bill-would-bar-discrimination-engage-the-public-on-better-policy/</link>
	<description>Tracking the battle over Network Neutrality</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 03:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: House introduces another Net Neutrality Bill (H.R.5994) &#171; Aaron Shaw&#8217;s weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2008/02/12/internet-bill-would-bar-discrimination-engage-the-public-on-better-policy/#comment-112800</link>
		<dc:creator>House introduces another Net Neutrality Bill (H.R.5994) &#171; Aaron Shaw&#8217;s weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 14:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2008/02/12/internet-bill-would-bar-discrimination-engage-the-public-on-better-policy/#comment-112800</guid>
		<description>[...] in its regulatory language and also includes a provision that would require the FCC to hold nation-wide hearings to discuss Internet governance. This democratized approach has induced the RIAA and the MPAA to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] in its regulatory language and also includes a provision that would require the FCC to hold nation-wide hearings to discuss Internet governance. This democratized approach has induced the RIAA and the MPAA to [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Help Save the Internet from Goodlatte and Big Telecom : Star City Harbinger</title>
		<link>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2008/02/12/internet-bill-would-bar-discrimination-engage-the-public-on-better-policy/#comment-92666</link>
		<dc:creator>Help Save the Internet from Goodlatte and Big Telecom : Star City Harbinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 20:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2008/02/12/internet-bill-would-bar-discrimination-engage-the-public-on-better-policy/#comment-92666</guid>
		<description>[...] If you want to track the latest bill to protect Net Neutrality, the Internet Freedom Protection Act of 2008 (HR 5353), click HERE [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] If you want to track the latest bill to protect Net Neutrality, the Internet Freedom Protection Act of 2008 (HR 5353), click HERE [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Corrosive Influence of Telecom Lobbyists &#124; Jcyreus dot Com :: [J-seer-ee-uhs]</title>
		<link>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2008/02/12/internet-bill-would-bar-discrimination-engage-the-public-on-better-policy/#comment-89161</link>
		<dc:creator>The Corrosive Influence of Telecom Lobbyists &#124; Jcyreus dot Com :: [J-seer-ee-uhs]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 23:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2008/02/12/internet-bill-would-bar-discrimination-engage-the-public-on-better-policy/#comment-89161</guid>
		<description>[...] is a lot of talk going on right now about net neutrality and the Internet Freedom Preservation Act of 2008.  Fact of the matter is that telecom lobbyists will continue to impose their corrosive influence [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] is a lot of talk going on right now about net neutrality and the Internet Freedom Preservation Act of 2008.  Fact of the matter is that telecom lobbyists will continue to impose their corrosive influence [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teddy3Bears</title>
		<link>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2008/02/12/internet-bill-would-bar-discrimination-engage-the-public-on-better-policy/#comment-88766</link>
		<dc:creator>Teddy3Bears</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 23:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2008/02/12/internet-bill-would-bar-discrimination-engage-the-public-on-better-policy/#comment-88766</guid>
		<description>One reason Comcast needs to be stopped is their foray into internet telephones. The advertise putting Verizon out of business, and they tell you that your QoS is the same as a land-line. But on the website hidden from view is the caveat that you should not use it for 911 calls. Comcast has up to a 3 - 5 wait for a technician to arrive, and they go down all the time. We also need to make this a front as to why Comcast can not be trusted, because they can not manage what they already have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One reason Comcast needs to be stopped is their foray into internet telephones. The advertise putting Verizon out of business, and they tell you that your QoS is the same as a land-line. But on the website hidden from view is the caveat that you should not use it for 911 calls. Comcast has up to a 3 - 5 wait for a technician to arrive, and they go down all the time. We also need to make this a front as to why Comcast can not be trusted, because they can not manage what they already have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cherrybombed &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Who Will Kill The Internet First: UK vs USA Edition&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2008/02/12/internet-bill-would-bar-discrimination-engage-the-public-on-better-policy/#comment-88498</link>
		<dc:creator>cherrybombed &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Who Will Kill The Internet First: UK vs USA Edition&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 19:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2008/02/12/internet-bill-would-bar-discrimination-engage-the-public-on-better-policy/#comment-88498</guid>
		<description>[...] the US front, the bi-partisan Internet Preservation Act of 2008 (or HR 5353) was just introduced last week. And while HR 5353 really doesn&#8217;t do much, there are components [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] the US front, the bi-partisan Internet Preservation Act of 2008 (or HR 5353) was just introduced last week. And while HR 5353 really doesn&#8217;t do much, there are components [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mediageek radioshow &#187; mediageek 2008-02-15: The Push Is On for Net Neutrality</title>
		<link>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2008/02/12/internet-bill-would-bar-discrimination-engage-the-public-on-better-policy/#comment-88277</link>
		<dc:creator>mediageek radioshow &#187; mediageek 2008-02-15: The Push Is On for Net Neutrality</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 23:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2008/02/12/internet-bill-would-bar-discrimination-engage-the-public-on-better-policy/#comment-88277</guid>
		<description>[...] interest groups, tech companies, academics and activists, highlighted by the introduction of the “Internet Freedom Preservation Act of 2008” (HR 5353). On this edition of the program we hear excerpts from two nationwide press conference calls [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] interest groups, tech companies, academics and activists, highlighted by the introduction of the “Internet Freedom Preservation Act of 2008” (HR 5353). On this edition of the program we hear excerpts from two nationwide press conference calls [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tragnark.com/blog &#187; net neutrality: HR 5353</title>
		<link>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2008/02/12/internet-bill-would-bar-discrimination-engage-the-public-on-better-policy/#comment-87982</link>
		<dc:creator>tragnark.com/blog &#187; net neutrality: HR 5353</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 18:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2008/02/12/internet-bill-would-bar-discrimination-engage-the-public-on-better-policy/#comment-87982</guid>
		<description>[...] Article source [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Article source [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: News from Rob &#187; Markey&#8217;s Net Neutrality bill</title>
		<link>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2008/02/12/internet-bill-would-bar-discrimination-engage-the-public-on-better-policy/#comment-87884</link>
		<dc:creator>News from Rob &#187; Markey&#8217;s Net Neutrality bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 07:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2008/02/12/internet-bill-would-bar-discrimination-engage-the-public-on-better-policy/#comment-87884</guid>
		<description>[...] cycle, or the Snowe-Dorgan bill introduced earlier this year in the Senate. &#160;So why is the SavetheInternet coalition excited, and why is telecom shill Scott Cleland in a lather, calling this a wolf in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] cycle, or the Snowe-Dorgan bill introduced earlier this year in the Senate. &nbsp;So why is the SavetheInternet coalition excited, and why is telecom shill Scott Cleland in a lather, calling this a wolf in [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: News from Rob &#187; Markey&#8217;s Net Neutrality bill</title>
		<link>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2008/02/12/internet-bill-would-bar-discrimination-engage-the-public-on-better-policy/#comment-87885</link>
		<dc:creator>News from Rob &#187; Markey&#8217;s Net Neutrality bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 07:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2008/02/12/internet-bill-would-bar-discrimination-engage-the-public-on-better-policy/#comment-87885</guid>
		<description>[...] cycle, or the Snowe-Dorgan bill introduced earlier this year in the Senate. &#160;So why is the SavetheInternet coalition excited, and why is telecom shill Scott Cleland in a lather, calling this a wolf in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] cycle, or the Snowe-Dorgan bill introduced earlier this year in the Senate. &nbsp;So why is the SavetheInternet coalition excited, and why is telecom shill Scott Cleland in a lather, calling this a wolf in [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TF News, Action and Analysis &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Again: Tell Congress to Support Internet Freedom</title>
		<link>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2008/02/12/internet-bill-would-bar-discrimination-engage-the-public-on-better-policy/#comment-87813</link>
		<dc:creator>TF News, Action and Analysis &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Again: Tell Congress to Support Internet Freedom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 23:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2008/02/12/internet-bill-would-bar-discrimination-engage-the-public-on-better-policy/#comment-87813</guid>
		<description>[...] here for more information about the bill introduced by Reps. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) and Chip Pickering [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] here for more information about the bill introduced by Reps. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) and Chip Pickering [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
