<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Verizon Blocks Pro-Choice Text Messaging</title>
	<link>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2007/09/26/verizon-blocks-pro-choice-text-messaging/</link>
	<description>Tracking the battle over Network Neutrality</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 03:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: cingular ringtones shop cingular shop ringtones</title>
		<link>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2007/09/26/verizon-blocks-pro-choice-text-messaging/#comment-89649</link>
		<dc:creator>cingular ringtones shop cingular shop ringtones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 09:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2007/09/26/verizon-blocks-pro-choice-text-messaging/#comment-89649</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;info personal phone remember ringtones samsung info personal phone remember ringtones sprint...&lt;/strong&gt;

Similarly cricket download free ringtones ringtones for alltel cell phone...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>info personal phone remember ringtones samsung info personal phone remember ringtones sprint&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Similarly cricket download free ringtones ringtones for alltel cell phone&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog on Wiki Patterns &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Blogger call tomorrow on internet blocking and Net Neutrality</title>
		<link>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2007/09/26/verizon-blocks-pro-choice-text-messaging/#comment-75585</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog on Wiki Patterns &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Blogger call tomorrow on internet blocking and Net Neutrality</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 18:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2007/09/26/verizon-blocks-pro-choice-text-messaging/#comment-75585</guid>
		<description>[...] with one another &#8212; through the BitTorrent, Gnutella, and other applications.&#8221; and Verizon and AT&#38;T have engaged in censorship of musicians and politican movements that are critical of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] with one another &#8212; through the BitTorrent, Gnutella, and other applications.&#8221; and Verizon and AT&amp;T have engaged in censorship of musicians and politican movements that are critical of [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shedat.Com &#187; Comment on Verizon Blocks Pro-Choice Text Messaging by Ericrabe</title>
		<link>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2007/09/26/verizon-blocks-pro-choice-text-messaging/#comment-69769</link>
		<dc:creator>Shedat.Com &#187; Comment on Verizon Blocks Pro-Choice Text Messaging by Ericrabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 19:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2007/09/26/verizon-blocks-pro-choice-text-messaging/#comment-69769</guid>
		<description>[...] wrote an interesting post today on Comment on Verizon Blocks Pro-Choice Text Messaging by EricrabeHere&#8217;s a quick [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] wrote an interesting post today on Comment on Verizon Blocks Pro-Choice Text Messaging by EricrabeHere&#8217;s a quick [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ericrabe</title>
		<link>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2007/09/26/verizon-blocks-pro-choice-text-messaging/#comment-69766</link>
		<dc:creator>Ericrabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 16:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2007/09/26/verizon-blocks-pro-choice-text-messaging/#comment-69766</guid>
		<description>Check the post at http://policyblog.verizon.com/PolicyBlog/Blogs/policyblog/EricRabe9/371/VERIZON-WIRELESS-STATEMENT-ON-TEXT-MESSAGING.aspx

Here's a copy or Verizon Wireless statement this 9(/26/07) morning:

BASKING RIDGE, N.J. – On Wednesday, September 26, Verizon Wireless received a letter from NARAL regarding the company’s policy on text messaging.  The following statement may be attributed to Jeffrey Nelson, spokesperson for Verizon Wireless.

“The decision to not allow text messaging on an important, though sensitive, public policy issue was incorrect, and we have fixed the process that led to this isolated incident.

“Upon learning about this situation, senior Verizon Wireless executives immediately reviewed the decision and determined it was an incorrect interpretation of a dusty internal policy.  That policy, developed before text messaging protections such as spam filters adequately protected customers from unwanted messages, was designed to ward against communications such as anonymous hate messaging and adult materials sent to children.

“Verizon Wireless is proud to provide services such as text messaging, which are being harnessed by organizations and individuals communicating their diverse opinions about issues and topics.  We have great respect for this free flow of ideas and will continue to protect the ability to communicate broadly through our messaging service.”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check the post at <a href="http://policyblog.verizon.com/PolicyBlog/Blogs/policyblog/EricRabe9/371/VERIZON-WIRELESS-STATEMENT-ON-TEXT-MESSAGING.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://policyblog.verizon.com/PolicyBlog/Blogs/policyblog/EricRabe9/371/VERIZON-WIRELESS-STATEMENT-ON-TEXT-MESSAGING.aspx</a></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a copy or Verizon Wireless statement this 9(/26/07) morning:</p>
<p>BASKING RIDGE, N.J. – On Wednesday, September 26, Verizon Wireless received a letter from NARAL regarding the company’s policy on text messaging.  The following statement may be attributed to Jeffrey Nelson, spokesperson for Verizon Wireless.</p>
<p>“The decision to not allow text messaging on an important, though sensitive, public policy issue was incorrect, and we have fixed the process that led to this isolated incident.</p>
<p>“Upon learning about this situation, senior Verizon Wireless executives immediately reviewed the decision and determined it was an incorrect interpretation of a dusty internal policy.  That policy, developed before text messaging protections such as spam filters adequately protected customers from unwanted messages, was designed to ward against communications such as anonymous hate messaging and adult materials sent to children.</p>
<p>“Verizon Wireless is proud to provide services such as text messaging, which are being harnessed by organizations and individuals communicating their diverse opinions about issues and topics.  We have great respect for this free flow of ideas and will continue to protect the ability to communicate broadly through our messaging service.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
