<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AT&#038;T Plays Gatekeeper. Censors Pearl Jam.</title>
	<link>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2007/08/09/att-plays-gatekeeper-censors-pearl-jam/</link>
	<description>Tracking the battle over Network Neutrality</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 13:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Threat is Real Internet Freedom &#124; What Is Wrong With The World Today</title>
		<link>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2007/08/09/att-plays-gatekeeper-censors-pearl-jam/#comment-122728</link>
		<dc:creator>The Threat is Real Internet Freedom &#124; What Is Wrong With The World Today</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 00:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2007/08/09/att-plays-gatekeeper-censors-pearl-jam/#comment-122728</guid>
		<description>[...] August 2007, AT&#38;T censored a live webcast of a Pearl Jam concert just as lead singer Eddie Vedder criticized President [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] August 2007, AT&amp;T censored a live webcast of a Pearl Jam concert just as lead singer Eddie Vedder criticized President [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sometimes The Right Can Be Wrong (Gasp!) &#124; crashsystems.net</title>
		<link>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2007/08/09/att-plays-gatekeeper-censors-pearl-jam/#comment-113315</link>
		<dc:creator>Sometimes The Right Can Be Wrong (Gasp!) &#124; crashsystems.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 19:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2007/08/09/att-plays-gatekeeper-censors-pearl-jam/#comment-113315</guid>
		<description>[...] is a form of censorship, but what about political censorship? During the live Internet stream of a Pearl Jam concert in 2007 the lead singer was muted just as he sang lyrics critical of George Bush. There are many [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] is a form of censorship, but what about political censorship? During the live Internet stream of a Pearl Jam concert in 2007 the lead singer was muted just as he sang lyrics critical of George Bush. There are many [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lazy geisha - &#187; Speak Up: FCC Coming to Harvard to discuss Net Neutrality</title>
		<link>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2007/08/09/att-plays-gatekeeper-censors-pearl-jam/#comment-89276</link>
		<dc:creator>lazy geisha - &#187; Speak Up: FCC Coming to Harvard to discuss Net Neutrality</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 21:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2007/08/09/att-plays-gatekeeper-censors-pearl-jam/#comment-89276</guid>
		<description>[...] example that we can’t even trust Ma Bell not to read our email or listen to our phone calls, or censor our webcasts, or allow our torrent streams to operate correctly, or to even be free to criticize their [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] example that we can’t even trust Ma Bell not to read our email or listen to our phone calls, or censor our webcasts, or allow our torrent streams to operate correctly, or to even be free to criticize their [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ACTION ALERT !! Don't Let Congress Ruin the Internet</title>
		<link>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2007/08/09/att-plays-gatekeeper-censors-pearl-jam/#comment-87648</link>
		<dc:creator>ACTION ALERT !! Don't Let Congress Ruin the Internet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 20:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2007/08/09/att-plays-gatekeeper-censors-pearl-jam/#comment-87648</guid>
		<description>[...] August 2007, AT&#38;T censored a live webcast of a Pearl Jam concert just as lead singer Eddie Vedder criticized President [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] August 2007, AT&amp;T censored a live webcast of a Pearl Jam concert just as lead singer Eddie Vedder criticized President [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charlesn</title>
		<link>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2007/08/09/att-plays-gatekeeper-censors-pearl-jam/#comment-85200</link>
		<dc:creator>charlesn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 21:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2007/08/09/att-plays-gatekeeper-censors-pearl-jam/#comment-85200</guid>
		<description>It kills me every time I see people on the internet commenting about “They (AT&#38;T) apologized, are making good, it wasn’t AT&#38;T, they just didn't want to get into the middle of the politics”, etc. Not here at savetheinternet.com, but on more general access blogs.

To anyone who thinks this was a “mistake” by a third party vendor, or that AT&#38;T has ANY problem with being in the middle of a political agenda: given AT&#38;T’s history with the Bush regime, wiretapping, NSA, etc, AND then taking the subject matter which was censored into consideration, if you can say with a straight face that this was just an overzealous "third-party" and not AT&#38;T... You are a better liar than most. 

Yes, they released the censored footage uncensored. But you know what? It was released after the fact, missing its moment of peak emotional impact (when everyone was watching it being sung online). Then AT&#38;T can say "Look, we made good" and try to look like the good guys while dramatically reducing the impact on their good friends, Premier Bush and Co.

Quite brilliant, really.

Some people need to pull their heads out of the sand.

Just because it is not covered under the First Amendment AS WORDED, doesn't mean that it doesn't strike at the heart of the First. I am quite sure that something like the Internet had never even been imagined when the First was written. Nor did they envision a situation where the biggest source of censorship is NOT the government, but private corporations that own all of the dissemination channels. Remember, at the time, the government WAS the biggest source of censorship, and The Right we enjoy of Free Speech only matters one bit if we can get our message out to others. And once your blogs are censored as they go across AT&#38;T's internet pipes, what then?

I mean, come on, people. Wake up. The problem with this is not so much what is going on today, but how far they could reach tomorrow if we don't say STOP, right here and now. Just imagine how much content would actually get through if anything offensive to anyone was filtered at the (internet) network level.

The roots of the problem are apparent even in this thread. Nearly any idea will have both proponents and opponents. So, it stands to reason that nearly everything can be construed as offensive to SOMEONE. If you filter the offensive content, just what does that leave, exactly?

And that's not even taking into consideration the rest of the world. How long to you think that free-thinking countries in the rest of the world are going to put up with US censorship of things? I imagine that the solution for them would be to simply isolate the US from the rest of the internet (if we didn't do it ourselves first).

And the scariest part is that none of this happens overnight. It is one baby step at a time, so slowly that people not paying attention will never even see it, until one day, there is no more free speech, no more content being broadcast anywhere that isn't sanitized and pre-approved by a few big conglomerates.

If you don't have a problem with that vision, then please have your head checked by a professional.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It kills me every time I see people on the internet commenting about “They (AT&amp;T) apologized, are making good, it wasn’t AT&amp;T, they just didn&#8217;t want to get into the middle of the politics”, etc. Not here at savetheinternet.com, but on more general access blogs.</p>
<p>To anyone who thinks this was a “mistake” by a third party vendor, or that AT&amp;T has ANY problem with being in the middle of a political agenda: given AT&amp;T’s history with the Bush regime, wiretapping, NSA, etc, AND then taking the subject matter which was censored into consideration, if you can say with a straight face that this was just an overzealous &#8220;third-party&#8221; and not AT&amp;T&#8230; You are a better liar than most. </p>
<p>Yes, they released the censored footage uncensored. But you know what? It was released after the fact, missing its moment of peak emotional impact (when everyone was watching it being sung online). Then AT&amp;T can say &#8220;Look, we made good&#8221; and try to look like the good guys while dramatically reducing the impact on their good friends, Premier Bush and Co.</p>
<p>Quite brilliant, really.</p>
<p>Some people need to pull their heads out of the sand.</p>
<p>Just because it is not covered under the First Amendment AS WORDED, doesn&#8217;t mean that it doesn&#8217;t strike at the heart of the First. I am quite sure that something like the Internet had never even been imagined when the First was written. Nor did they envision a situation where the biggest source of censorship is NOT the government, but private corporations that own all of the dissemination channels. Remember, at the time, the government WAS the biggest source of censorship, and The Right we enjoy of Free Speech only matters one bit if we can get our message out to others. And once your blogs are censored as they go across AT&amp;T&#8217;s internet pipes, what then?</p>
<p>I mean, come on, people. Wake up. The problem with this is not so much what is going on today, but how far they could reach tomorrow if we don&#8217;t say STOP, right here and now. Just imagine how much content would actually get through if anything offensive to anyone was filtered at the (internet) network level.</p>
<p>The roots of the problem are apparent even in this thread. Nearly any idea will have both proponents and opponents. So, it stands to reason that nearly everything can be construed as offensive to SOMEONE. If you filter the offensive content, just what does that leave, exactly?</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s not even taking into consideration the rest of the world. How long to you think that free-thinking countries in the rest of the world are going to put up with US censorship of things? I imagine that the solution for them would be to simply isolate the US from the rest of the internet (if we didn&#8217;t do it ourselves first).</p>
<p>And the scariest part is that none of this happens overnight. It is one baby step at a time, so slowly that people not paying attention will never even see it, until one day, there is no more free speech, no more content being broadcast anywhere that isn&#8217;t sanitized and pre-approved by a few big conglomerates.</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t have a problem with that vision, then please have your head checked by a professional.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hotabb.Com &#187; AT&#38;T Plays Gatekeeper. Censors Pearl Jam.</title>
		<link>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2007/08/09/att-plays-gatekeeper-censors-pearl-jam/#comment-74144</link>
		<dc:creator>Hotabb.Com &#187; AT&#38;T Plays Gatekeeper. Censors Pearl Jam.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 19:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2007/08/09/att-plays-gatekeeper-censors-pearl-jam/#comment-74144</guid>
		<description>[...] (Catherine Crump, ACLU) wrote an interesting post today on AT&#38;amp;T Plays Gatekeeper. Censors Pearl Jam.Here&#8217;s a quick [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] (Catherine Crump, ACLU) wrote an interesting post today on AT&amp;amp;T Plays Gatekeeper. Censors Pearl Jam.Here&#8217;s a quick [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matchafa: Une collection de médias pour comprendre le monde &#187; Xavier Caféïne censuré!!!</title>
		<link>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2007/08/09/att-plays-gatekeeper-censors-pearl-jam/#comment-67702</link>
		<dc:creator>Matchafa: Une collection de médias pour comprendre le monde &#187; Xavier Caféïne censuré!!!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 07:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2007/08/09/att-plays-gatekeeper-censors-pearl-jam/#comment-67702</guid>
		<description>[...] Un mois après que Pearl Jam ait été censuré par At&#38;T aux États-Unis pour avoir critqué Bus..., voici que maintent au Québec, Xavier Caféïne est censuré par Telus parce qu&#8217;il critique le concepte même des drapeaux (et en particulier le drapeau du Québec) dans sa chanson &#60;&#60;Les corbeaux&#62;&#62; au Festival Osheaga hier. Vous pouvez le constatez par vous-même au site de Telus en regardant le show de Xavier Caféïne à 7min45sec Telus censure les paroles de Xavier Caféïne.  Le choix de censure de Telus est très intéressant. Quand Xavier parle du drapeau anarachiste Telus ne censure pas mais quand c&#8217;est le drapeau Québecois alors Télus censure. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Un mois après que Pearl Jam ait été censuré par At&amp;T aux États-Unis pour avoir critqué Bus&#8230;, voici que maintent au Québec, Xavier Caféïne est censuré par Telus parce qu&#8217;il critique le concepte même des drapeaux (et en particulier le drapeau du Québec) dans sa chanson &lt;&lt;Les corbeaux&gt;&gt; au Festival Osheaga hier. Vous pouvez le constatez par vous-même au site de Telus en regardant le show de Xavier Caféïne à 7min45sec Telus censure les paroles de Xavier Caféïne.  Le choix de censure de Telus est très intéressant. Quand Xavier parle du drapeau anarachiste Telus ne censure pas mais quand c&#8217;est le drapeau Québecois alors Télus censure. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Chronic Condition &#187; &#8220;Hey, you wouldn&#8217;t hit a guy with a cock in his mouth, would ya?&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2007/08/09/att-plays-gatekeeper-censors-pearl-jam/#comment-66997</link>
		<dc:creator>A Chronic Condition &#187; &#8220;Hey, you wouldn&#8217;t hit a guy with a cock in his mouth, would ya?&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 20:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2007/08/09/att-plays-gatekeeper-censors-pearl-jam/#comment-66997</guid>
		<description>[...] In More News That Enrage, I bring you AT&#38;T censoring a Pearl Jam concert because one of the lyrics to a song talked about Dubya in a ... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] In More News That Enrage, I bring you AT&#38;T censoring a Pearl Jam concert because one of the lyrics to a song talked about Dubya in a &#8230; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spiraling</title>
		<link>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2007/08/09/att-plays-gatekeeper-censors-pearl-jam/#comment-66965</link>
		<dc:creator>spiraling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 04:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2007/08/09/att-plays-gatekeeper-censors-pearl-jam/#comment-66965</guid>
		<description>Cameras everywhere, limited use of internet, expensive booze due to failing economy. What is a person to do?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cameras everywhere, limited use of internet, expensive booze due to failing economy. What is a person to do?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AT&#38;T Censors Pearl Jam for Anti-Bush Comments. &#171; The Vinyl Farm</title>
		<link>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2007/08/09/att-plays-gatekeeper-censors-pearl-jam/#comment-66640</link>
		<dc:creator>AT&#38;T Censors Pearl Jam for Anti-Bush Comments. &#171; The Vinyl Farm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 17:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2007/08/09/att-plays-gatekeeper-censors-pearl-jam/#comment-66640</guid>
		<description>[...] AT&#38;T Plays Gatekeeper. Censors Pearl Jam. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] AT&amp;T Plays Gatekeeper. Censors Pearl Jam. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
