Sen. Kerry: Not Pulling Punches on Airwaves Auction

June 14th, 2007 by tkarr

By Sen. John Kerry

I welcome this opportunity from the folks at SavetheInternet.com to let you know directly my thoughts on the “700″ auction. This is a very important issue, and I really commend the work done by everyone involved in the effort to get so much activism built up around what can be an arcane discussion.

Sen. Kerry

Guest Blog Post by Sen. John Kerry

Click here for more on Thursday’s hearing

There are a lot of powerful forces working to get the same-old/same-old, big-money auction; I’ve already gotten a letter from an industry group challenging my stance.

So it’s great to know that there are so many activists committed to working together for a better telecommunications infrastructure for the country. Our country has always pushed the curve and led the way in technological advances, and yet we are falling behind in broadband deployment to an alarming degree. That’s unacceptable.

And this auction, as all of you understand so well, is an enormous opportunity to start to give our country the telecommunications infrastructure it deserves.

Or at least to set up the conditions where entrepreneurs can do so. We don’t want to continue to tilt bandwidth policy to line the pockets of a privileged few.

I wanted to share my statement from the Commerce Committee hearing today. As I said, I’m watching the FCC on this, and my statements this week were a shot across their bow to let them know I’m not going to pull any punches.

Mr. Chairman, the upcoming auction of spectrum in the 700 band has profound implications for consumers, schools, businesses, emergency first responders, and rural communities. We are presented with a unique opportunity to shape the future of wireless communication and innovation in America.

With this auction, we stand at a crossroads—we can either provide extraordinary benefits to millions of Americans or tilt bandwidth policy to line the pockets of a privileged few.

There is a clear path I believe must be taken: the airwaves belong to the American people, and their use should serve the public interest.

We must establish rules in this auction that encourage competitive entry into the wireless market, spur innovation and increase affordability and availability of broadband services.

There is no argument that we are lagging in deployment. More than 60 percent of Americans do not subscribe to broadband service—primarily because they don’t have access or can’t afford it.

My own state of Massachusetts, a recognized leader in innovation and technological advancement, has a 49% broadband penetration rate. And it is 4th best in the country.

So this auction of very valuable spectrum, takes on heightened importance. How do we ensure it works for the American people?

First, the Commission must promote the broadest level of participation in the auction, to encourage competition – and enable entrepreneurs to think innovatively, and provide affordable, high-speed wireless broadband services. Auction rules should be directed at promoting additional market entrants. Open access proposals and innovative bidding rules must be closely considered.

Secondly, the FCC must settle on strict build out requirements that compel auction winners to offer services. Now, I understand the fears of industry in this area. If we are forced to build networks, it delays service and innovation.

I am confident the Commission can find the appropriate balance – The spectrum must be deployed in a reasonable time. What would be unacceptable is a set of rules that allow large companies to scoop up and warehouse this spectrum. I have been encouraged by the Chairman’s attention to this matter, and I will be looking for a strong set of requirements.

Finally, I am encouraged that the Commission is taking a close look at solutions for public safety. We have been working on the interoperability for quite some time. And despite our efforts, Mr. Chairman, interoperability remains one of our most vexing policy challenges — despite the lessons of 9/11 and Hurricane Katrina.

Providing an effective public safety communications network is of paramount importance, and I am encouraged that industry leaders are thinking about the topic in an innovative way.

All Americans have an opportunity to benefit from this auction. This is more than an issue of Government revenue – it is also about expanded access to revolutionary new technology for every American. Our economy, our schools, our families and our first responders are counting on the FCC to conduct a fair auction in the spirit of competition and innovation that drives our country.

I, for one, will be watching closely.

6 Responses to “Sen. Kerry: Not Pulling Punches on Airwaves Auction”

  1. citizenblog Says:

    Way to Go Kerry!! I rarely listen to a politician that doesn’t come out with a bunch of diatribe but managed to watch the live proceedings in the senate on the internet today and was cheering as Kerry spoke the above words. Why auction the spectrum off? Why not have citizen’s vote for who should receive licences? After all the Government is “We the People” isn’t it? Are we going to have a say in how the revenues generated are spent if we don’t have a say in who gets the available spectrum?

    Hampden Mitchell

  2. Community Media: Selected Clippings - 06/14/07 (700 MHz) « Clippings for PEG Access Television Says:

    […] I’ve already gotten a letter from an industry group challenging my stance.   —> http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2007/06/14/sen-kerry-not-pulling-punches-on-airwaves-auction/ […]

  3. webn8 Says:

    I’ve been thinking lately… How exactly do these companys plan to control every single server on the internet? Is it really plausable for them to control the internet including giants like Google and Yahoo? I have a feeling you’re going to say that they will control it because people get internet access from them, but consider this, are Comcast, Verizon, and AT&T the only ISP’s? What about all the other ISP’s out there such as Netzero, Lifeline, Quest, Sprint, MSN, Earthlink, Cox, etc etc etc? If Comcast etc sets up this exclusive internet service, don’t you think that all their customers just might switch providers?

  4. citizenblog Says:

    I assume you are not a sockpuppet webn8. Comcast, Verizon and AT& T might not be the only ISP’s but they can and do use their monopoly position in telecommunications to stifle innovation..rake huge abnormal profits as well as lobby and pay huge amounts of money to keep it like that. There are no guarantees what they will do if they are given more spectrum and rights to own the “public” airwaves. Huge areas of rural America don’t have competitive broadband service because the phone companies do not see enough profits in this provison. When there are no laws governing this discrimination private companies do as they wish to the detriment of the public interest. In reality there is little choice available to most citizens hence only 40% of Americans have broadband access.

    Hampden Mitchell

  5. ajwood Says:

    If Senator Kerry’s suggesting that this auction be used to stimulate new entrant rules, now would be a good time to be specific about the size, color and business interests that entrants should have.
    Today’s FCC is lost when it comes to establishing these specifics for us but they can be useful in ‘guidance mode’ participation if a group proposes specifics for them first. Citing past inequities concerning minority owned outlets albeit constructively, a case for shaping a new rule can take place easier.

    It’s exciting to see regular folks here gaining on the process of rubber stamp auction ’sales’ however changes in FCC rules take place in their own time frame and priority. Don’t kid yourselves, initiative prioritization *is* political and a new White House can scuttle well intended initiatives too. That’s why it’s so important to specify to the Commission what exactly a New Entrant would be.
    I can think of a few examples but to change the rule and only walk away with expense driven tokenism that drive New Entrants away won’t make us happy.
    The priority of spectrum auctions is to make as much money as possible while doing the least amount of work selling something that costs nothing and the FCC is just the right candidate for such a job.
    To steer the Commission away from spreadsheet justification to continue with the same-old corporate auctions I suggest we instill in them a sense that “we are watching and we are not going away”.
    Because when it comes to money, the priority is already established.

  6. valles Says:

    I’d like to see some battle plans for this next challenge. I don’t want another FCC protecting my freedom of speech, I’d like the space to be rented rather than sold, so the people can demand time for presidential debates. I don’t want advertising or news propaganda spewing into my education or entertainment, we don’t need a Fox, NBC or CBS. I don’t think we need national entertainment services. The space should be reserved for high range wireless internet service and should be serviced by whomever of the community decides.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Creative Commons License
Contact Us
Privacy Policy

No corporation, trade group or political party funds the SavetheInternet.com campaign.
Site designed and maintained by Free Press Action Fund | Hosting by SingleHop