<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When Astroturf Calls</title>
	<link>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2007/05/18/when-astroturf-calls/</link>
	<description>Tracking the battle over Network Neutrality</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 03:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: MediaChannel.org</title>
		<link>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2007/05/18/when-astroturf-calls/#comment-56768</link>
		<dc:creator>MediaChannel.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 14:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2007/05/18/when-astroturf-calls/#comment-56768</guid>
		<description>[...] SAVE THE INTERNET: Whereas television often suppresses public debate, Gore believes that the Internet encourages it. He writes that it &#8220;has extremely low entry barriers for individuals. It is the most interactive medium in history and the one with the greatest potential for connecting individuals to one another and to a universe of knowledge &#8230; It&#8217;s a platform, in other words, for reason.&#8221; While the majority of the major television networks ignored Comey&#8217;s testimony, blogs continue to cover it. Online watchdogs are holding the media accountable for responsible reporting. Presidential candidates are increasing their presence on the web, with several candidates allowing users to interact with each and give feedback to the campaigns. Ordinary citizens are able to submit questions to candidates during presidential debates. But as Gore warns, there is still just a &#8220;very small number of broadband network operators&#8221; who have an &#8220;an economic incentive to extend their control over the physical infrastructure of the network to leverage control of Internet content. If they went about it in the wrong way, these companies could institute changes that have the effect of limiting the free flow of information over the Internet in a number of troubling ways.&#8221; Help Save the Internet by telling Congress to preserve net neutrality here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] SAVE THE INTERNET: Whereas television often suppresses public debate, Gore believes that the Internet encourages it. He writes that it &#8220;has extremely low entry barriers for individuals. It is the most interactive medium in history and the one with the greatest potential for connecting individuals to one another and to a universe of knowledge &#8230; It&#8217;s a platform, in other words, for reason.&#8221; While the majority of the major television networks ignored Comey&#8217;s testimony, blogs continue to cover it. Online watchdogs are holding the media accountable for responsible reporting. Presidential candidates are increasing their presence on the web, with several candidates allowing users to interact with each and give feedback to the campaigns. Ordinary citizens are able to submit questions to candidates during presidential debates. But as Gore warns, there is still just a &#8220;very small number of broadband network operators&#8221; who have an &#8220;an economic incentive to extend their control over the physical infrastructure of the network to leverage control of Internet content. If they went about it in the wrong way, these companies could institute changes that have the effect of limiting the free flow of information over the Internet in a number of troubling ways.&#8221; Help Save the Internet by telling Congress to preserve net neutrality here. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
