http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2007/03/15/house-leadership-urges-fcc-to-support-net-neutrality/ Tracking the battle over Network Neutrality Fri, 29 Aug 2008 23:31:18 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3 http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2007/03/15/house-leadership-urges-fcc-to-support-net-neutrality/#comment-52842 MediaChannel.org Tue, 24 Apr 2007 16:17:49 +0000 http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2007/03/15/house-leadership-urges-fcc-to-support-net-neutrality/#comment-52842 [...] profit of $2.8 billion, compared to $1.4 billion in the 2006 first quarter. The company’s shares have risen a whopping 11 percent since it signed on to Net Neutrality conditions in its BellSouth [...] […] profit of $2.8 billion, compared to $1.4 billion in the 2006 first quarter. The company’s shares have risen a whopping 11 percent since it signed on to Net Neutrality conditions in its BellSouth […]

]]> http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2007/03/15/house-leadership-urges-fcc-to-support-net-neutrality/#comment-51118 voiceofreason Wed, 18 Apr 2007 16:28:46 +0000 http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2007/03/15/house-leadership-urges-fcc-to-support-net-neutrality/#comment-51118 How can you accuse the telco's of monopolies? They are trying to encourage and protect free market forces. A MONOPOLY means ONE, UNO, UN, single. And your use of the work telcoS is an oxyMORON. When has anyone ever heard of brotherly love amongst telcos? Dude, that kind of syncopation of private agendas does not exist. Can you imagine all the double talk and self destructing napkin note passing that would have to occur. It is obviously a consensus based on logic, not only by the telcos but but by MANY content provider on the internet that free exchange of information should be as such. A bramble bush is a bramble bush if you labelle it 'provider maniuplation' or 'net neutrality'. Control is control. Free the markets. Cut the out hype. How can you accuse the telco’s of monopolies? They are trying to encourage and protect free market forces. A MONOPOLY means ONE, UNO, UN, single. And your use of the work telcoS is an oxyMORON. When has anyone ever heard of brotherly love amongst telcos? Dude, that kind of syncopation of private agendas does not exist. Can you imagine all the double talk and self destructing napkin note passing that would have to occur. It is obviously a consensus based on logic, not only by the telcos but but by MANY content provider on the internet that free exchange of information should be as such. A bramble bush is a bramble bush if you labelle it ‘provider maniuplation’ or ‘net neutrality’. Control is control. Free the markets. Cut the out hype.

]]> http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2007/03/15/house-leadership-urges-fcc-to-support-net-neutrality/#comment-45830 Markey and Dingell, Perfect Together! Sun, 18 Mar 2007 20:25:49 +0000 http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2007/03/15/house-leadership-urges-fcc-to-support-net-neutrality/#comment-45830 [...] hope that Markey and Dingell continue to keep Kevin Martin's cojones in the fire. Martin has a lot to answer for. Wednesday’s [...] […] hope that Markey and Dingell continue to keep Kevin Martin’s cojones in the fire. Martin has a lot to answer for. Wednesday’s […]

]]> http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2007/03/15/house-leadership-urges-fcc-to-support-net-neutrality/#comment-44630 seaowl Fri, 16 Mar 2007 16:41:18 +0000 http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2007/03/15/house-leadership-urges-fcc-to-support-net-neutrality/#comment-44630 The companies nedd some incentive to do the buildout. The Governments role should be to moniter that buildout along with ensuring minimum speeds and reliability at a reasoable cost. The biggest threat to an open Internet is bandwith scarcity and unequal deployment. The companies nedd some incentive to do the buildout. The Governments role should be to moniter that buildout along with ensuring minimum speeds and reliability at a reasoable cost. The biggest threat to an open Internet is bandwith scarcity and unequal deployment.

]]> http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2007/03/15/house-leadership-urges-fcc-to-support-net-neutrality/#comment-44597 grovulent Fri, 16 Mar 2007 15:51:58 +0000 http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2007/03/15/house-leadership-urges-fcc-to-support-net-neutrality/#comment-44597 Of course the question is any politicians would ever let <a href="http://danielhaggard.com/?p=4" rel="nofollow"> net neutrality die. Of course the question is any politicians would ever let net neutrality die.

]]>