<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gun Owners: Net neutrality Preserves the Free Market Essence of the Internet</title>
	<link>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2006/05/09/gun-owners-net-neutrality-preserves-the-free-market-essence-of-the-internet/</link>
	<description>Tracking the battle over Network Neutrality</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 23:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: mjb</title>
		<link>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2006/05/09/gun-owners-net-neutrality-preserves-the-free-market-essence-of-the-internet/#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator>mjb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 May 2006 19:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2006/05/09/gun-owners-net-neutrality-preserves-the-free-market-essence-of-the-internet/#comment-145</guid>
		<description>"In a truly free market, Network Neutrality would not be necessary, as good old American competition would drive the very best service up the ladder of success."

Guess I shouldn't complain that the gun nuts and economic libertarians reach the same conclusions as us "unhinged moonbats", but it's ridiculous that they cling to this simplistic dogma that is proven false time and again, especially in such monopolized markets as telecom. Substitute "very best" with "most wealthy, ruthless, selfish, unscrupulous, irresponsible, public health-endangering, media-controlling, stock-market-manipulative, and monopolizing" and it rings a little truer...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;In a truly free market, Network Neutrality would not be necessary, as good old American competition would drive the very best service up the ladder of success.&#8221;</p>
<p>Guess I shouldn&#8217;t complain that the gun nuts and economic libertarians reach the same conclusions as us &#8220;unhinged moonbats&#8221;, but it&#8217;s ridiculous that they cling to this simplistic dogma that is proven false time and again, especially in such monopolized markets as telecom. Substitute &#8220;very best&#8221; with &#8220;most wealthy, ruthless, selfish, unscrupulous, irresponsible, public health-endangering, media-controlling, stock-market-manipulative, and monopolizing&#8221; and it rings a little truer&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: directorblue</title>
		<link>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2006/05/09/gun-owners-net-neutrality-preserves-the-free-market-essence-of-the-internet/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>directorblue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 23:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2006/05/09/gun-owners-net-neutrality-preserves-the-free-market-essence-of-the-internet/#comment-133</guid>
		<description>Two words: OUT-freaking-standing.  Okay, maybe that was three words.

Either way, well done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two words: OUT-freaking-standing.  Okay, maybe that was three words.</p>
<p>Either way, well done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lewhich</title>
		<link>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2006/05/09/gun-owners-net-neutrality-preserves-the-free-market-essence-of-the-internet/#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>lewhich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 21:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2006/05/09/gun-owners-net-neutrality-preserves-the-free-market-essence-of-the-internet/#comment-131</guid>
		<description>Extremely well put. 
I thought the internet ways financed by tax payers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Extremely well put.<br />
I thought the internet ways financed by tax payers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
