In Minnesota, Hundreds Urge FCC to Protect Net Neutrality

It was standing room only at South High in Minneapolis on Thursday night as more than 750 people turned out to show their support for Net Neutrality and free speech online. FCC Commissioners Michael Copps and Mignon Clyburn listened to hours of impassioned public testimony about the future of the Internet.

From librarians to IT specialists to local journalists, dozens of people lined up behind the microphone to express their concern about an Internet future that looks much like cable TV, where the public’s voices are stifled and major corporations pick and choose the content – mostly theirs – that we can access most readily.

Over a thousand more people watched the hearing online thanks to a live stream provided by the Minnesota citizen journalist project The Uptake. And the Twitter stream was on fire as folks joined the conversation from their homes. You can check out the archived Twitter feed here.

Minnesota Sen. Al Franken and Secretary of State Mark Ritchie were also on hand to speak at the public hearing organized by Free Press, the Center for Media Justice and Main Street Project.

Franken, who called Net Neutrality the “First Amendment issue of our time” in a recent speech, urged the FCC to protect Internet users and prevent discrimination online.

“We can’t let companies write the rules that they're supposed to follow,” Franken said. “If that happens, those rules are going to be written only to protect corporations. I urge the FCC to oppose any efforts to undermine Net Neutrality and to impede the flow of information online.”

Franken also made a strong call for the FCC to oppose the proposed Comcast-NBC merger, citing the negative evidence of the impact of media consolidation on the marketplace of ideas.

Watch the video of his speech.

Commissioner Copps took the stage to call on his colleagues at the FCC to take steps to restore the agency’s authority to regulate broadband and protect Internet users. He also weighed in on the controversial Internet policy proposals recently put forward by Google and Verizon. He said:

    I suppose you can’t blame companies for seeking to protect their own interests. But you can blame policy-makers if we let them get away with it. Deal-making between big Internet players is not policy-making for the common good. Special interests are not the public interest. Stockholders are not the only stakeholders. I will not settle — you should not settle — for gatekeepers of the Internet striking deals that exchange Internet freedom for bloated profits on their quarterly reports to Wall Street.

During her speech, Commissioner Clyburn emphasized the importance of expanding broadband infrastructure and called the open Internet “the great equalizer.” “It has been said that the Internet has as democratizing effect as the printing press,” she said. “It enables under represented groups, including minorities and women, to have an opportunity to be heard.”

Amalia Deloney, grassroots policy director with the Center for Media Justice, reminded the audience that even as the Internet has become a vital tool for every day life, millions still lack access. “We are here because the future of the Internet is in jeopardy,” Deloney said. “More and more, U.S. residents are going online to conduct day-to-day activities like paying bills, going to school, searching for jobs, or researching health care. We need Chairman Genachowski to re-establish the FCC’s authority over the communications system of the 21st century.”

While debates over technology policy are often held behind closed doors or riddled with jargon, the huge turnout and energetic crowd in Minneapolis demonstrated deep public concern over where the Internet is headed.

Free Press President Josh Silver said in his speech:

    The number of people in the audience tonight, and watching online reminds us all that the debate over the future of the Internet is not just for techies, bloggers or geeks. It is about nothing less than the future of all communications and democracy itself. As Internet speeds increase, television, radio, phone service, and technologies we never dreamed of will be delivered by a high speed Internet connection. As goes the Internet goes journalism, education, entertainment, community engagement, innovation and our economy.

The hearing can be viewed in its entirety on the Web at www.theuptake.org.

Free Press is a national, nonpartisan organization working to reform the media. Free Press does not support or oppose any candidate for public office. Through education, organizing and advocacy, we promote diverse and independent media ownership, strong public media and universal access to communications.

Jenn Ettinger

Media Coordinator Jenn Ettinger focuses on media relations, ensuring that Free Press maintains an effective and consistent media presence. She works closely with the communications director to draft and distribute press releases, make pitch calls to reporters, and assist with media scheduling and promotion. Read Jenn's full bio »

Comments

Kyle's picture

Net Neutrality

By Kyle (not verified) on September 20, 2010

I am not happy with the direction that this is taking in the media.

A freelance translator's picture

Too early

By A freelance translator (not verified) on September 13, 2010

We are not there yet. it is too early to make the final decision on net neutrality issues. We should wait a decade or two until we decide on the future of the 21st technology

Kyle's picture

Net Neutrality

By Kyle (not verified) on September 20, 2010

I don't think we should wait a decade to wait. We need to define a plan now rather than wait for it to be decided for us...
Spyware Blockers

Bruce Wolfe's picture

If net neutrality is lost

By Bruce Wolfe (not verified) on September 13, 2010

If net neutrality is lost, then a case must be made to require service level agreements (SLA) of all ISPs. If ISPs want to control what we see and get, then we should demand what we are paying for; guaranteed symmetrical speed and low latency rates for what is advertised and then purchased by us. They have the technology to allow as much bandwidth as they want, especially, the cable companies but they just throttle it down. We all know that other countries are offering fiber speeds at this time for the same price.

Big ISP cannot have their cake and eat it, too. They cannot block us from content AND throttle our connectivity. This is way too private Big Brother. It's beyond free market and monopolistic, if not, anti-trust in that there is a conspiracy among all ISPs to throttle and tier connectivity speeds without SLAs.

Bobbi's picture

Net neutrality

By Bobbi (not verified) on August 31, 2010

This is vital for anyone who wants to ever start a business online. None of us should have to fall in line behind businesses that have more money to spend in order to get our businesses to go through as fast as another's. The Internet is for all the people to use. I, for one, am sick and tired of the wealthy controlling everything and now the Internet too. The government needs to stop this in its tracks. Thanks for this great article.

James Bennett's picture

media-consolidation & net-neutrality

By James Bennett (not verified) on August 24, 2010

this is audio of Com. Copps at the Aug. 19,2010 Minnesota hearing.
http://www.entertonement.com/clips/jmpwqfgmzt--fcc-copps-20100819-net-ne...

and a REMIX of Senator Frankin's comments on media-consolidation
http://www.entertonement.com/clips/yplgzqrmty--fcc-franken-20100819-medi...

These clips can be embeded on your blog

Anonymous's picture

Should the rich have more votes?

By Anonymous (not verified) on August 22, 2010

Should the rich have more votes or equivalently should we lose our votes and voices? Think of a silver spooner whose only skill is to hire and threaten to fire if a certain return isn't met. This is kind of how the 'elites' think of media and political representation. They are used to owning both and getting what they want as a result. When sponsors can't use media systems to force you to look at what you don't want to look at they can't hold politicians captive through lobbying. This means the internet is causing them to lose their grip on power. But we as a people want them gone because they've presided over the loss of our standard of living. We want a functioning democracy.

We have to remember that the internet is probably the beginning of what comes after nation states and we have to preserve it against the interests of both the state and corporations. Its the key to have society for the sake of society and to having socially useful institutions.

Solid Abs's picture

This is a really great post.

By Solid Abs (not verified) on September 13, 2010

This is a really great post. But we as a people want them gone because they've presided over the loss of our standard of living. We want a functioning democracy.
Regards,
Kevin from How To Get Abs

Earnest nelson's picture

προώθηση ιστοσελίδων

By Earnest nelson (not verified) on September 14, 2010

H NWD ιδικεύεται στην αποτελέσματική προώθηση ιστοσελίδων και σας βοηθά να εκτοπίσετε τον
ανταγωνισμό. Μετά την σχεδίαση ιστοσελίδας χρειάζεται να προωθήσετε το site σας.
Η βελτιστοποίηση ιστοσελίδων που παρέχουμε στηρίζεται σε 100% οργανικές μεθόδους.

Anonymous's picture

We have to remember that the

By Anonymous (not verified) on September 20, 2010

We have to remember that the internet is probably the beginning of what comes after nation states and we have to preserve it against the interests of both the state and corporations. Its the key to have society for the sake of society and to having socially useful institutions.

Yes... the above ^^ is true.

Free Press is a national, nonpartisan, nonprofit organization working to reform the media. Through education, organizing and advocacy, we promote diverse and independent media ownership, strong public media, quality journalism, and universal access to communications.

Learn More »

close [x]

The Free Press Action Fund is member-supported. We don't take money from government, political parties or businesses. Member contributions fuel our work lobbying Congress and the FCC, filing lawsuits and legal complaints, and aggressively advocating for real changes in media policymaking that benefit the public.

Donate To the Free Press Action Fund »

close [x]