Losing the Internet as We Know It

How much have you already used the Internet today?

We don't think twice about how much we rely on the Internet. Imagine not being able to map directions on Google or check the weather online. A business that doesn't have a Web site? Forgettable. Or rather, unsearchable. Remember when we didn't have e-mail? Would you want to go back to those Dark Ages? Me neither.

The Internet is in the very fabric of how we communicate, learn, shop, conduct business, organize, innovate and engage. If we lost it, we'd be lost.

But did you know that we're at risk of losing the Internet as we know it? Millions of Americans don't know that a battle over the future of the Internet is being played out right now in Washington. How it ends will have deep repercussions for decades to come.

On one side are public interest and consumer groups, small businesses, Internet entrepreneurs, librarians, civil libertarians and civil rights groups who want to preserve the Internet as it is - the last remaining open communications platform where anyone with access and a computer can create and consume online content.

Right now a film student in Idaho can upload a video the same way a Hollywood movie studio can. A small upstart company can launch a brilliant idea that challenges the Fortune 500. An independent journalist can break a story without waiting for a newspaper to run or print it.

The principle of "Network Neutrality" is what makes this open communications possible. Net Neutrality is what allows us to go wherever we want online. Our relationship with the phone and cable companies stops when we pay for our Internet service. These companies can not block, control or interfere with what we search for or create online; nor can they prioritize some content over others -making the Hollywood video load faster than the kid's video in Idaho.

On the other side are the Internet service providers, who want to dismantle Net Neutrality. Not only do they want to provide Internet service, but they want to be able to charge users to prioritize their content, effectively giving themselves the ability to choose which content on the Web loads fast, slow or not at all. The film student, the small entrepreneur, and the independent journalist will be lost in the ether, unable to compete with other, more established companies who can pay for a spot in the fast lane.

Gone is the level playing field. Gone is the multitude of voices on the Web. Gone is the Internet as we know it - unless we act now.

The Federal Communications Commission is crafting new Net Neutrality rules right now. The public has until Thursday at midnight to tell the FCC what we value about the Internet, and why we want the agency to create a strong Net Neutrality rule to protect it.

I'm filing my comments today, and I have to admit, it's a little tough -- not because I'm at a loss for words, but because there's so much to say.

I'm filing because:

  • An open Internet gives me freedom of expression - freedom to write and share my views and the freedom to find alternative viewpoints;
  • I want other, smarter people to come up with the next Google, the next YouTube, the next Web application that I can't even imagine;
  • I want to read about people and cultures that are different from me;
  • Mainstream media make me scream expletives, and I use the Internet to find alternative sources of news and information;
  • I want to e-mail my boyfriend a link to a picture that reminds me of our last vacation;
  • Net Neutrality means I don't need anyone's permission to create my own videos, and media execs aren't determining what's funny - we are;
  • I come up with potential million-dollar ideas all the time, and some day, I just might start my own business;
  • An open Internet feeds the activist in me, allowing me to engage with my community and organize for social change online;
  • It's winter and I'd rather shop online, only I still want to support a local business;
  • I needed advice on how to prime and paint a room, and found a video online that taught me how to do it; and,
  • I don't want to be censored.

This is why I'm filing. Why are you? If you care about how the Internet impacts and boosts your life, and if you care about how the Internet could evolve in years to come, it's essential that you tell the FCC by Thursday.

This post was first published on The Huffington Post.

Free Press is a national, nonpartisan organization working to reform the media. Free Press does not support or oppose any candidate for public office. Through education, organizing and advocacy, we promote diverse and independent media ownership, strong public media and universal access to communications.

Megan Tady

Megan Tady is a blogger, video producer and freelance writer who previously served as the Free Press communications coordinator. She blogs at SavetheInternet.com and SavetheNews.org. Follow her on Twitter @MegTady.

Read Megan's full bio »

Comments

Vintage_User's picture

Save The Net

By Vintage_User (not verified) on January 13, 2010

Your problem is, you don't know anything about the Internet.
The Internet was created to share information between scientists and the DOD.
It has Always been limited by the throughput of the hardware and communication lines between the hardware.
After 30 years of mostly Textual data exchange, we overnight, dumped a Billion users on to the internet, with video, phone, and full-time application users.
The communication lines supporting the internet were not capable of supporting the traffic suddenly thrust upon it.
The communications companies have been overwhelmed, trying to upgrade the "physical" internet to accommodate this volume of traffic. It takes time to completely remake the internet, with our current technology and the demand is increasing faster than the current technology will support.
But, you take the internet fror granted and assume it's some sort of right to be able to access it, at Lightspeed.
We used it for years, when it took Days for a search to return an answer. When it took All Day to download something, it took you all Week to find, and you were glad to be able to do it.
The communication lines have a finite limit of data transfer bandwidth and the providers have a limited piece of the pie. A piece that is too small, to support the unreasonable demands of all these spoiled, instant gratification users.
Transfer rationing will solve itself, as the capability to support the load evolves.
However, I digress...
The Real motive of the Net Neutrality legislation is to Nationalize our greatest Free Thought/Speech/Information medium and eventually the Government will completely control what content, at what speed, etc.
This is just another Misdirection movement by the current Socialist administration to destroy Net Freedom, under the guise of ensuring Net Neutrality.
Just my opinion, while I'm still Free to voice it.

Anonymous_Man's picture

Already filed my comments

By Anonymous_Man (not verified) on January 12, 2010

I already filed my comments for a strong set of Net Neutrality rules and even recommended they extend Net Neutrality to apply to wireless phone carriers. With any luck hopefully Congress too will act and pass the Internet Freedom & Preservation Act to protect Net Neutrality.

Free Press is a national, nonpartisan, nonprofit organization working to reform the media. Through education, organizing and advocacy, we promote diverse and independent media ownership, strong public media, quality journalism, and universal access to communications.

Learn More »

close [x]

The Free Press Action Fund is member-supported. We don't take money from government, political parties or businesses. Member contributions fuel our work lobbying Congress and the FCC, filing lawsuits and legal complaints, and aggressively advocating for real changes in media policymaking that benefit the public.

Donate To the Free Press Action Fund »

close [x]