Protecting the Public's First Amendment Rights
By Andrew Jay Schwartzman, December 16, 2009
Testifying at yesterday's FCC hearing on Net Neutrality, Media Access Project's Andrew Jay Schwartzman emphasized that the Commission should implement policies to promote the public’s First Amendment right to free expression and civic participation. He argued that the FCC should give little credence to Internet service providers' demands for unfettered discretion over speech on their networks.
He said:
- Internet service providers can’t have it both ways. If they wish to continue to receive liability protections relating to copyright infringement, they cannot turn around and claim to have First Amendment rights to edit others’ content. ISPs do not materially contribute to the content they retransmit, and they receive important protections based on the presumption that they do not function as speak.
-
Policies that promote creation of content-neutral, viewpoint-neutral platforms for free expression help fulfill the mandate of the First Amendment that government should seek to promote the public’s right to have access to diverse and varied social, political, artistic expression. By creating a better informed electorate such practices advance the operation of democratic self-governance.
Download Schwartzman’s full testimony here.
Free Press is a national, nonpartisan organization working to reform the media. Free Press does not support or oppose any candidate for public office. Through education, organizing and advocacy, we promote diverse and independent media ownership, strong public media and universal access to communications.
Andrew Jay Schwartzman
Andrew Jay Schwartzman has directed Media Access Project (MAP) since June, 1978. Read Andrew's full bio »

Comments
I believe
I believe same applies to the web hosting industry. I believe there is a heavy weight on them as well.
Jenny
Net Neutrality
Although I like the idea of net neutrality rules to protect our rights, I just do not like the idea of the government designing the paper writing and legislations restricting something within specified bounds (by force if necessary) on websites, content, and bandwidth (isp throttling) which is not good for innovation. - essay writer
I think any form of
I think any form of censorship is not welcome, regardless of form. There descute of its applicability, but should never be censorship.
I have some projects implemented on the internet (otimização de sites, desentupidora, acompanhantes and grafica) and would not want to be censored, while agreeing that there should be rules for everything.
christian louboutin shoes
thank you for sharing it .and the article is very inspiring us to working hard in the company which sells christian louboutin shoes online.please come and see it.
Speech
I am all in for content and viewpoint neutral platforms.ISPs cannot have it both ways.This is definitely a better recipe for creative expression and flourishing growth.Please let us know how we can help
Oakland Ca Homes
Speech
I am all in for a Content Neutral Internet.ISPs cannot have it both ways.This is definitely a better model for creativity and formula for prosperity.Please let us know how we can contribute.
Oakland Ca Sale
christian louboutin boots
How excellent you are! And we are all prode of you .And after reading your article I know how to make the valuable life.So I also share something to everyone----christian louboutin----they are so great that most girl have chosen it and made themselves look like queens.I think they will bacome your best choice ---- beautiful girls .
Hey,guy!You are great!I appreciate your comment,enjoy it, of course agree with you! You know I won’t admire anything unless it is real perfect !Such as I prefer the Christian Louboutin boots,They are the most magical and sexy shoes!You never see,you never know if you don’t wear them!