25,000 People Tell FCC to Put the Public First, Support Net Neutrality
By Megan Tady, October 21, 2009
What happens when some members of Congress don’t speak for the people they represent? We speak for ourselves.
At first, the numbers seemed daunting -- dozens of our lawmakers sold out their own constituents by urging the FCC to rethink its plans to adopt new Net Neutrality protections.
But the public has responded in a massive way – over the last two days, 25,000 people have signed a letter to the FCC in support of Net Neutrality and called out members of Congress for capitulating to phone and cable lobbyists. Thousands of these signers to today’s letter are from the congressional districts whose members went against their wishes last week.
Washington needs to know whom it really works for. The FCC is poised to take a giant step for the public interest. Tomorrow, the agency plans to announce a notice of proposed rulemaking that would make Net Neutrality a reality. The FCC’s action has received strong support from the White House, congressional leadership and nearly every consumer advocacy and public interest organization in the country. If the FCC succeeds, it would be a huge win for the millions of people who have fought so hard for Net Neutrality.
The big phone and cable companies have launched an all-out assault to stop this from happening, scrambling to prevent the FCC from even beginning to discuss a new rule. They've hired hundreds of lobbyists, spent tens of millions of dollars, and unleashed sleazy Astroturf groups to mislead politicians, distort the facts and resurrect long-debunked myths.
And some of their tactics are working on our lawmakers, who are now putting the interests of AT&T and Comcast ahead of ours. They were probably hoping we wouldn’t notice this deception. Well, we did… and we’re sending our own message to the FCC: Don’t listen to members of Congress who’ve sold out the public for AT&T. We demand an open Internet for generations to come.
Join the tens of thousands who are speaking out in support of FCC action this week, and the millions who have signed the petition for Net Neutrality.
Then make sure your representative hears from you about Net Neutrality. Here’s a list of the lawmakers who dropped the ball, and how you can reach them.
Free Press is a national, nonpartisan organization working to reform the media. Free Press does not support or oppose any candidate for public office. Through education, organizing and advocacy, we promote diverse and independent media ownership, strong public media and universal access to communications.
Megan Tady
Megan Tady is a blogger, video producer and freelance writer who previously served as the Free Press communications coordinator. She blogs at SavetheInternet.com and SavetheNews.org. Follow her on Twitter @MegTady.
Read Megan's full bio »


Comments
Is government the best solution?
Net neutrality is good in theory, however, who's to say the FCC won't take this added power and abuse it or mess the whole internet up?
What past success can we point to that shows the FCC is the best organization to solve this problem?
I'd submit that a private oversight entity would be better, infinitely better.
TechNewsWorld has a good article highlighting reasons we ought to consider a private solution rather than further government oversight:
http://www.technewsworld.com/story/How-to-Solve-the-Net-Neutrality-Issue...
Now if only would use the
Now if only would use the money they spent on lobbyist for the advancement of their broadband networks there would be nothing to complain about
What are the GOALS of Net Neutrality?
I keep reading how so many have stood up for the people against the big corporate giants. What are the stated GOALS of the Net Neutrality movement? Is it to provide free Internet for all paid for and regulated by Government? I never see DETAILS of what Net Neutrality actually means. Please Explain.
It's all here:
It's all here: http://www.savetheinternet.com/faq
The goals of our movement are pretty clear: to keep control of the Internet in the hands of the people who use it every day and in every way -- and out of the hands of a couple of large Internet service providers who seek to prioritize certain Web sites, content and applications over others.
We have published an extraordinary amount of material on why Net Neutrality is vital to protecting the Internet as an engine of free speech, economic growth, open markets and civic participation.
Take a moment and check them out.