They Work for Us

Sometimes you have to remind Washington politicians whom they really work for. Today is one of those days.

The big phone and cable companies have launched an all-out assault on Capitol Hill to try to stop Net Neutrality. They've hired hundreds of lobbyists, spent tens of millions of dollars, and unleashed sleazy Astroturf groups to mislead politicians, distort the facts, and resurrect long-debunked myths.

The bad news is that these dirty and deceitful tactics appear to be working on a few people who should know better.

This afternoon, several dozen Democrats sent a letter to the Federal Communications Commission asking them to walk away from their plans to protect Net Neutrality.

Their letter parrots telco talking points -- which had to come from somewhere, and it certainly wasn’t from the more than 1.6 million people who have signed a petition in support of Net Neutrality.

It’s outrageous: The lawmakers we’ve elected to look out for us in Washington are saying they’d rather hand the Internet over to a few powerful corporations than safeguard it for the public.

They're also going against President Obama’s tech agenda that supports a free and open Internet, where competition and innovation can flourish. The president has said he'll take a "back seat to no one in my commitment to Net Neutrality" -- but it looks like these legislators are riding in the wrong car.

In September, following through on Obama's campaign pledge, FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski announced that the commission would make clear rules to protect Net Neutrality, the principle that stops Internet service providers from blocking and controlling online content. On Thursday, the FCC will vote on a notice of proposed rulemaking to establish Net Neutrality rules, which is the first step in the regulatory process.

But the deep-pocketed telco lobby on the Hill is doing everything it can to derail protections for an open Internet. They're trying to poison the well even before the rules are circulated for public comment.

How is it that a handful of corporations are co-opting the debate? This is a clear example of "special interests" vs. "real Americans."

Corporations don’t want any rules that prohibit them from acting as Internet gatekeepers -- they don’t even want the FCC to consider them. And they’ve got the influence and power to convince lawmakers to act against our interests and reject an open Internet.

But we’re powerful, too, and we’ve got to show it. Now’s not the time to be timid. We need the millions of people who've spoken out in support of Net Neutrality to send a resounding message to the FCC that the public supports them. And we need to let millions more know that the future of the Internet is at stake.

Add your name to the petition for an open Internet right now. Then Tweet it. Facebook it. Ask your friends to do it. The fight for Net Neutrality is very real, and it’s getting nasty.

Oh, and if you see the name of your representative at the bottom that letter, you might want to give them a call and remind them who's boss.

Comments

Anonymous's picture

Sleazy Astroturf groups

By Anonymous (not verified) on October 27, 2009

Please define "sleazy Astroturf groups", and how one group of people has been slammed and denigrated for exercising their First Amendment rights, and are now further demeaned when people replace logical arguments with callous statements designed to allow emotion to rule over logic.

Doesn't that fall under some sort of "hate crime" law?

"Hate crimes (also known as bias-motivated crimes) occur when a perpetrator targets a victim because of his or her perceived membership in a certain social group, usually defined by racial group, religion, sexual orientation, disability, ethnicity, nationality, age, gender, gender identity, or political affiliation.[1]"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_crime

lv bags's picture

That little blue box -

By lv bags (not verified) on October 26, 2009

That little blue box - everyone woman dreams of seeing it come their way. tiffany jewelry jewelry is world renowned for its stunning quality and top of the line artisanship; however, it also has a reputation for having a price tag that is way out of most people's leagues.
discount tiffany jewelry That doesn't mean you can't get that Tiffany look you want at a price you can afford, however. Thanks to replica Tiffany jewelry, you can look like you are draped in Tiffany jewelry, and yet still have the money left in your pocket to go out and show off your looks.

Bob Wittman's picture

Disappointed but Expected

By Bob Wittman (not verified) on October 21, 2009

Unfortunately, my Representative did sign the letter. It's tough being a Democrat here in Kansas, but this should be a nonpartisan issue. Instead Representative Moore chose to be a shill for the industry instead of a voice for the people that elected. I will continue to write and call him about this issue as well as others. Remaining optimistic is a full time job and it shouldn't be.

Morris Veeneman's picture

Amazed and Thankful

By Morris Veeneman (not verified) on October 17, 2009

Amazed, that any member of Congress would sign that document.
Thankful, none of my Representitives signed it.

IMHO, every one of the signers should be recalled by their constituents, just for signing the letter.
I dont believe it's a matter of opinion, but of public trust.
If they are not informed on the issue, they shouldn't have signed the letter, and if they are informed and signed it anyway, well...
In either case they are in no position of trust to sign their name to any document governing U.S. citizens.

Tim Karr's picture

Here's what I tweeted to my

By Tim Karr on October 17, 2009

Here's what I tweeted to my rep:

" Retweet to ask why @rep_albio_sires sold out voters for telco money. Demand an open Internet. #NetNeutrality http://twurl.nl/peeeji "

Thirteen of these 72 have twitter accounts:

-- Joe Baca (CA-43) @bacaca43
-- Glenn Nye (VA-02) @glennnye
-- Gregory Meeks (NY-06) @gregorymeeks
-- Jared Polis (CO-02) @jaredpolis
-- Leonard Boswell (IA-03) @leonardboswell
-- Marcia Fudge (OH-11) @mlfudge
-- Albio Sires (NJ-13) @rep_albio_sires
-- Russ Carnahan (MO-03) @repcarnahan
-- Hank Johnson (GA-04) @rephankjohnson
-- John Barrow (GA-12) @repjohnbarrow
-- Michael Michaud (ME-02) @repmikemichaud
-- Ed Perlmutter (CO-07) @repperlmutter
-- Kurt Schrader (OR-05) @repschrader

You might want to tweet them a message.

Edward Craig's picture

Link?

By Edward Craig (not verified) on October 16, 2009

I'd appreciate a link to the letter so I can be sure my Representative isn't one of the half dozen dozen signatories.

Edward Craig's picture

Thanks

By Edward Craig (not verified) on October 16, 2009

Didn't suspect DeFazio'd be on that list, but needed to check.

Tim Karr's picture

Yep. My rep is there, too.

By Tim Karr on October 17, 2009

Yep. Sadly, my rep is there. And he's is going to be hearing about it, repeatedly.

louis vuitton's picture

louis vuitton louis vuitton

By louis vuitton (not verified) on October 29, 2009

louis vuitton
louis vuitton sale
replica louis vuittonI like all the SAs at my store so I just pass my purchases around. I treat them as a team which I'm sure hurts me bc I'll never achieve vip status but they all know me by name and I just go with whomever isn't busy.

louis vuitton's picture

The prices are kinda high but

By louis vuitton (not verified) on October 29, 2009

The prices are kinda high but they are from Aussie so all prices down there escalate. Good selection nothing looks used and they have
louis vuitton
louis vuitton wallet