Keep Off the Astroturf

If you haven't been paying attention to the rise of Astroturf in Washington, in the media and at your local town hall meeting, now's the time to tune in.

Astroturf front groups have been everywhere this summer -- spreading misinformation about health care reform, carbon emission caps and financial regulation.

Astroturf shills, notably FreedomWorks' Dick Armey and Americans for Prosperity's Tim Phillips, surface wherever and whenever reform policies threaten the corporate or political status quo.

Next on their hit list is Net Neutrality, the principle that prevents big phone and cable companies from deciding what you can and cannot do online.

They're already painting new Net Neutrality legislation as an attempt to "socialize the Internet."

They dismiss as "extremists" the more than 1.5 million who support a free-flowing Web. The national coalition that supports Net Neutrality includes such "far-left elements" as the Christian Coalition, The Gun Owners of America and the American Library Association.

Astroturf red-baiting has only just begun.

The Boy Who Cried Socialism

All Net Neutrality really does is protect market competition, consumer choice and online innovation. But don't tell that to the astroturfer-in-chief, Scott Cleland of NetCompetition.org. His group is funded by phone and cable companies to attack legitimate consumer organizations and to confuse the public about Net Neutrality.

In testimonies before Congress, Cleland supported Net Neutrality before being paid by AT&T to oppose it. And oppose it he has: "Just like the Soviet socialists, the Net Neutrality movement blatantly misrepresents the facts," Cleland once said.

Take that, librarians!

Behind their Cold War rhetoric is a dirty little secret: Astroturf groups are set up and funded by corporations to erect Potemkin Villages of public support for any given issue, to sway politicians with PR and junk science, and to fool members of the media into putting them on the air.

Typically, these groups won't reveal their sources of funding, and with very few exceptions, the media forget to ask about it.

That's why Armey and Phillips squirmed under the lights when Rachel Maddow broke with the mainstream this month and pressed them about the money propping up their operations.

And it's why Free Press just released "Astroturf: Exposing the Fake Grassroots," an interactive online tool that makes it easy to view the seedy underbelly of the Astroturf groups bankrolled by big phone and cable.

The tool tracks the huge amounts of money moving from phone and cable companies to lobbyists and political campaigns, and links it to the deceptive activities of coin-operated groups like FreedomWorks, Americans for Prosperity, NetCompetition.org and the Heartland Institute.

$incerity vs. Sincerity

The Heartland Institute, in particular, is a poster child for deception. This coin-operated "think tank" specializes in aping industry talking points to downplay global warming, oppose health care reform and attack Net Neutrality. Its Fortune 500 clients include Philip Morris USA, the ExxonMobil Corporation and major telecommunications companies.

When asked to report the sources of its funding, Heartland President Joseph L Bast said Heartland "now keeps confidential the identities of all our donors" because revealing it would give fodder to those who want to "abuse a sincere effort at transparency."

Like the others, the Heartland Institute seems to think a lack of transparency gives more credence to their arguments, when in fact, it simply demonstrates what more people are coming to realize: Astroturf has no place in politics.

A healthy 21st-century democracy doesn't need phony front groups. We need openness, accountability and real debate. And we need to know whom we're talking to--and who's talking to us.

The crucial policy decisions being made right now must be based on independent research, reliable data and honest brokers.

Powerful special interests must stop distorting the issues and hiding behind Astroturf.

-- Timothy Karr is the campaign director of Free Press, the national, not-for-profit media reform group. Free Press accepts no money from industry, industry groups, political parties or government.

Comments

sikiş's picture

dasdasda

By sikiş (not verified) on November 09, 2009

muhabbet sohbet sohbet, sohbet odaları es-es es es dizisi es es, es es dizisi msn, msn nickleri msn nickleri, msn avatarları türk tarihi genel türk tarihi genel türk tarihi, sikiş sikiş izle sikiş izle, götten sikiş sikiş, canli sikiş, porno porno izle porno izle, porno , amatör sikiş sikiş izle sikiş izle sikiş tatlı porno porno izle emo resimleri, emo nickleri emo nickleri, haberler haber oku canli haber, oyunlar oyun indir oyun yükle, bedava muzik indir mp3 indir mp3 indir, şarkı indir şarkı dinle bedava şarki indir mp3 indir tanks. admin.

stale2000's picture

Blog posts like these don't help the Net Neutrality cause.

By stale2000 (not verified) on August 30, 2009

I myself am a Libertarian as well as an avid supporter of Net Neutrality and it saddens me to see you turning this debate into left vs right one.

Your bringing up things such as health care reform and carbon emission caps which really have nothing to do with the Internet.

It also pains me to see that you are using the term "astroturf" which is actually a very insulting term that is used against people who have legitimate concerns about healthcare and carbon emission caps. You really should distance yourself from this term, as all it does is polarize people.

As someone who sees this important issue as a bi-partisan one I don't really think blog posts like these really help. By using these inflammatory keywords all you are doing is alienating people who very well might be on your side of the issue.

Anonymous's picture

Funding

By Anonymous (not verified) on August 20, 2009

Who is funding Free Press?

Tim Karr's picture

Transparency and Integrity

By Tim Karr on August 21, 2009

Free Press is happy to engage these Astroturf groups and coin-operated think tanks in a debate about conflicts of interest.

For too long, shady special interest money has polluted the waters of public discourse in America. Free Press is dedicated to a genuine debate from honest brokers. Paid shills who don't disclose their funding sources aren't good-faith actors. That's what we believe, and it's why we’re calling them out now.

From its inception, our not-for-profit, public interest organization has taken no money from industry, industry groups, political parties or government.

We have held firm to that. Free Press is simply following IRS guidelines for nonprofits when we list the amounts but not the names of our donors on our 990 form. We do publish a list of our funders in the annual report, which is freely available on our Web site. This includes the Ford Foundation, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, the Fidelity Charitable Gift Fund and more than 60 other charitable foundations.

We are also supported by more than 12,000 individual Free Press Action Fund members. The average size of an individual donation is $48. If you want to help the fight for public interest policies and an open Internet, go here: » http://www.freepress.net/donate

We have asked the Heartland Institute to reveal which industries and companies fund their efforts. They still refuse to name names, other than to say no single corporation or donor amounts to more than 5 percent of their total funding. So all we know is that they take money from a lot of corporations.

This is what we have gleaned from reporting requirements of some of these publicly-listed companies. Heartland has received checks from such Fortune 500 companies as Phillip Morris USA (to oppose research linking tobacco consumption to rising health care costs), ExxonMobil Corporation (to discredit scientific research linking global warming to man-made causes) and the phone and cable lobby (to attack Net Neutrality). This is just the tip of their Astroturf iceberg.

If Heartland were truly interested in honest debate, they'd come clean about which companies paying their bills just happen to have a stake in the outcomes of their "research."

But don’t hold your breath waiting for that.

Tim Karr, Free Press

William W Haywood's picture

I totally agree

By William W Haywood (not verified) on August 24, 2009

I have tried to contact heartland myself, via snail mail, because they don't give an e-mail address to contact them at. They are a no-reply kinda group. You call them 'astroturf groups'..I call them 'rock throwers', so it all amounts to the same thing. They hide and throw rocks just like children. It really shows what kind of problem we have..I mean, because there is anybody out there who could rationalize funding them.